INFLUENTIAL FACTORS AND OPTIMIZATION APPROACHES FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF INTEROCCLUSAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MAXILLA AND MANDIBLE WITH THE USE OF INTRAORAL SCANNING DATA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35220/2078-8916-2024-52-2.17Keywords:
occlusion, occlusal relationship, maxillomandibular relationship, intraoral scanning, dentistry, digital dentistry.Abstract
Purpose of the study. To study and systematize literature data on influential factors, features of registration and validity of diagnosed parameters for interocclusal relationship of maxilla and mandible (in conditions of static position of maximum intercuspidation), established using intraoral scanning technology, as well as approaches aimed at optimization for digital verification of such. Research methods. Conducted research was organized in the format of a comprehensive literature review. The search for scientific sources affiliated with the present research objective was provided through the Google Scholar system (https://scholar.google.com/) using keywords, such as «intraoral scanning», «virtual static occlusion», «bite scan», «maxillomandibular relationship» in their various combinations, while taking into account advanced search functions. If the information given in the summary of the scientific publication corresponded to the objective of present research, further detailed content analysis of the text within scientific paper was carried out with the search for data related to the formulated categories of the target content-analysis. Scientific novelty. The sensitivity of static occlusal relationships registration with the use of the intraoral scanning technology according to the available meta-analysis is set at the level of 0,76, while the specificity is set at the level of 0,80; at the same time, most previous studies reported the level of deviations within 0,5 mm when registering occlusal relationships and occlusal contacts based on intraoral scanning data, although higher levels of deviations were demonstrated in some publications. 70% sensitivity level and 95% specificity level could be considered as minimally acceptable for intraoral scans for clinically accurate assessment of interocclusal relationships. The accuracy of recording interocclusal relationship within the state of maximum intercuspation depends on the used intraoral scanning technology and varies between such. The presence of areas with missing two or more teeth reduces the accuracy of maxillomandibular relationship registration in the state of maximum intercuspation. Conclusions. Approach of static occlusion digital registration using an intraoral scanner can be interpreted as such with comparable accuracy to analog impressions in cases of absent aedentia areas, stable occlusal contacts, single prepared teeth, or absence of single teeth within the distal areas with sufficient stability of remaining occlusion. The number of teeth that are included within the scan aimed at registering interocclusal relationship, as well as their position, affect the accuracy of digital bite scans obtained by intraoral scanning technology. In the case of total rehabilitation with prosthetic constructions supported by natural teeth it is advisable to use classic elastomeric impressions, or a combination of such with digital bite scans obtained before preparation from the frontal and distal areas of the jaws (bilaterally) in order to properly register interocclusal relationship.
References
Factors that influence the accuracy of maxillomandibular relationship at maximum intercuspation acquired by using intraoral scanners: A systematic review / M. Revilla-León, A.B. Barmak, H. Tohme [et al]. Journal of dentistry. 2023. Vol. 138. P. 104718.
Differences in maxillomandibular relationship recorded at centric relation when using a conventional method, four intraoral scanners, and a jaw tracking system: A clinical study / M. Revilla-León, R. Agustín-Panadero, J.M. Zeitler [et al]. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2023. P. S0022-3913(22)00795-8.
Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner? / M. Revilla-León, M. Gómez-Polo, J.M. Zeitler [et al]. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022. P. S0022-3913(22)00564-9.
Virtual occlusal records acquired by using intraoral scanners: A review of factors that influence maxillomandibular relationship accuracy / N. Chinam, M. Bekkali, M. Kallas [et al]. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2023. Vol. 32(S2). P. 192-207.
Al-Rayes N. Z., Hajeer M. Y. Evaluation of Occlusal Contacts among Different Groups of Malocclusion using 3D Digital Models. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2014. Vol. 15(1). P. 46-55.
Guevara Reyes J. Clinical application of digitalization of occlusal contacts with dental scanner. Jaw Functional Orthopedics and Craniofacial Growth. 2022. Vol. 2(2). P. 56-63.
Shadid R., Sadaqah N. Accuracy of Virtual Static Articulation: A Systematic Review. The International journal of prosthodontics. 2022. Vol. 35(5). P. 627-646.
Three‐dimensional accuracy of digital static interocclusal registration by three intraoral scanner systems / K.Y. Wong, R. J. Esguerra, V.A.P. Chia [et al]. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2018. Vol. 27(2). P. 120-128.
Clinical investigations of the comparability of different methods used to display occlusal contact points / F. Heuser, C. Bourauel, H. Stark [et al]. International journal of computerized dentistry. 2020. Vol. 23(3). P. 245-255.
Tappert M. V., Grabowski H., Dammaschke T. Accuracy and reproducibility of the visualisation of occlusal contact points using analogue articulating foil or digital intraoral scanners in vitro. International journal of computerized dentistry. 2022. P. 1-25.
Hennen M. V., Blum H., Dammaschke T. Accuracy and reproducibility of the visualization of occlusal contact points using analog articulating foil or digital intraoral scanners in vitro. International journal of computerized dentistry. 2022. Vol. 25(2). P. 173-180.
Reliabilty of recording occlusal contacts by using intraoral scanner and articulating paper-A prospective study / R. Esposito, F. Masedu, M. Cicciù [et al]. Journal of Dentistry. 2024 .Vol. 142. P. 104872.
Comparison of the occlusal contact area of virtual models and actual models: a comparative in vitro study on Class I and Class II malocclusion models / H. Lee, J. Cha, Y.S. Chun [et al]. BMC Oral Health. 2018. Vol. 18. P. 1-9.
Bostancıoğlu S. E., Toğay A., Tamam E. Comparison of two different digital occlusal analysis methods. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2021. Vol. 26(2). P. 2095-2109.
Evaluation of the accuracy of T-scan system and Cerec Omnicam system used in occlusal contact assessment / R. Cao, H. Xu, J. Lin [et al]/ Heliyon. 2023. Vol. 9(2). P. e13476.
Digital Occlusion Analysis after Orthodontic Treatment: Capabilities of the Intraoral Scanner and T-Scan Novus System / D. Shopova, D. Bakova, S. Yordanova [et al]. Applied Sciences. 2023. Vol. 13(7). P. 4335.
Clinical study comparing the accuracy of interocclusal records, digitally obtained by three different devices / C. Fraile, A. Ferreiroa, M. Romeo Rubio [et al]. Clinical oral investigations. 2022. Vol. 26(6). P. 4663-4668.
Clinical accuracy and reproducibility of virtual interocclusal records / S. Abdulateef, F. Edher, A.G. Hannam [et al]. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2020. Vol. 124(6). P. 667-673.
Morsy N., El Kateb M. Accuracy of intraoral scanners for static virtual articulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of multiple outcomes. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022. P. S0022-3913.
Three‐Dimensional Static Articulation Accuracy of Virtual Models–Part I: System Trueness and Precision / S.H.X. Yee, R.J. Esguerra, A.A.Q.A. Chew [et al]. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2018. Vol. 27(2). P. 129-136.
Three‐Dimensional Static Articulation Accuracy of Virtual Models—Part II: Effect of Model Scanner‐CAD Systems and Articulation Method / S.H.X. Yee, R.J. Esguerra, A.A.Q.A. Chew [et al]. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2018. Vol. 27(2). P. 137-144.
Three-dimensional analysis of the accuracy of conventional and completely digital interocclusal registration methods / J.M. Ries, C. Grünler, M. Wichmann [et al]. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2022. Vol. 128(5). P. 994-1000.
Clinical evaluation of the precision of interocclusal registration by using digital and conventional techniques / Y. Iwauchi, S. Tanaka, E. Kamimura-Sugimura [et al]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022. Vol. 128(4). P. 611-617.
Digital mounting accuracy of 2 intraoral scanners with a single anterior or bilateral posterior occlusal scan: A three-dimensional analysis / C. Cha, S.W. Pyo, J.S. Chang [et al]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2023. Vol. 130(4). P. 612-e1.
Kakali L., Halazonetis D. J. A novel method for testing accuracy of bite registration using intraoral scanners. Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2023. Vol. 53(4). P. 254.
Precision of maxillo-mandibular registration with intraoral scanners in vitro / A. Gintaute, K. Aj, O. Ca [et al]. Journal of prosthodontic research. 2020. Vol. 64(2). P. 114-119.
Precision of the virtual occlusal record / K.P. Botsford, M.C. Frazier, A.A. Ghoneima [et al]. The Angle Orthodontist. 2019. Vol. 89(5). P. 751-757.
Influence of the number of teeth and location of the virtual occlusal record on the accuracy of the maxillo‐mandibular relationship obtained by using an intraoral scanner / M. Revilla‐León, J. Alonso Pérez‐Barquero, A. Zubizarreta‐Macho [et al]. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2023. Vol. 32(3). P. 253-258.
Clinical study on the accuracy of occlusal contacts on digital model / H.L. Liu, X.G. Liu, Y.M. Tian [et al]. Zhonghua kou Qiang yi xue za zhi= Zhonghua Kouqiang Yixue Zazhi= Chinese Journal of Stomatology. 2020. Vol. 55(10). P. 737-742.
Intraoral Digital Impressions for Virtual Occlusal Records: Section Quantity and Dimensions / E. Solaberrieta, A. Garmendia, A. Brizuela [et al]. Biomed Research International. 2016. Vol. 2016. P. 7173824-7173824.
Accuracy comparison of bilateral versus complete arch interocclusal registration scans for virtual articulation / J.D. Lee, D. Luu, T.W. Yoon [et al]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2023. P. S0022-3913.
The accuracy of virtual interocclusal registration during intraoral scanning / F. Edher, A.G. Hannam, D.L. Tobias [et al]. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018. Vol. 120(6). P. 904-912.
Park J. M., Jeon J., Heo S. J. Accuracy comparison of buccal bite scans by five intra-oral scanners. Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science. 2018. Vol. 34(1). P. 17-31.
Accuracy of optical interocclusal registration using an intraoral scanner / M. Okamoto, N. Tanabe, S. Fukazawa [et al]. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2023. Vol. 67(4). P. 619-625.
3D analysis of occlusal registration through geometry embedded library matching between quadrant and full-arch digital impression / Y. Jeong, Y.K. Kim, J.S. Shim [et al]. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2023. Vol. 27(7). P. 3771-3778.
Comparison of Virtual Intersection and Occlusal Contacts between Intraoral and Laboratory Scans: An In-Vivo Study / F. Beck, S. Lettner, L. Zupancic Cepic [et al.]. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023. Vol. 12(3). P. 996.
Accuracy of maximum intercuspal position located by using four intraoral scanners and an artificial intelligence-based program / M. Revilla-León, L. Fernández-Estevan, A.B. Barmak [et al]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2024. P. S0022-3913(24)00193-8.
Accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based program for locating the maxillomandibular relationship of scans acquired by using intraoral scanners / M. Revilla-León, M. Gómez-Polo, A.B. Barmak [et al]. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2024. P. S0022-3913(24)00053-2.
Revilla-León M., Zeitler J. M., Kois J. C. Digital diagnostic occlusal equilibration combining an intraoral scanner, optical jaw tracking system, and dental design program: A dental technique. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2024. P. S0022-3913(23)00818-1.
An overview of the digital occlusion technologies: Intraoral scanners, jaw tracking systems, and computerized occlusal analysis devices / M. Revilla‐León, D.E. Kois, J.M. Zeitler [et al]. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2023. Vol. 35(5). P. 735-744.
Occlusal Analysis in Natural Dentition: Systematic Review / B. Velásquez, M. Rodríguez, V. Mosquera [et al]. European
Journal of Dentistry. 2023. Vol. 17(03). P. 615-622.
Digital quantification of occlusal contacts: a methodological study / J. Sigvardsson, S. Nilsson, M. Ransjö [et al]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021. Vol. 18(10). P. 5297.
