IMPACT OF XENOGENEIC BONE SUBSTITUTES’ PARTICLE SIZE ON THE BONE TISSUE CHANGES IN THE AREA OF SUBANTRAL AUGMENTATION: RETROSPECTIVE LITERATURE ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35220/2078-8916-2022-44-2.17Keywords:
particle size, xenogeneic bone substitute, subantral augmentation.Abstract
Purpose of the study. To provide retrospective analysis of the potential impact of used xenogeneic bone substitutes’ particle size on the changes within the bone tissue in the area of subantral augmentation based on the previously provided studies. Research methods. The design of the study represented retrospective analysis of the literature, which included following stages: 1) formation of a target publications cohort from the PubMed database (https:// pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) using appropriate Mesh-terms and identification of such publications also in Google Scholar (https://scholar.google.com/) using keywords search tools; 2) selection of publications from the target cohort for a detailed content analysis based on the results of annotations processing; 3) analytical processing and content analysis of textual information of scientific articles included in the targeted sample. Scientific novelty. The retrospective analysis provided structurization and refinement of the data regarding the influence of physical characteristics of the particle size of xenogeneic origin bone substitutes on quantitative and qualitative changes within bone tissue in the area of provided subantral augmentation procedure, as the most adapted clinical and experimental model. Conclusions. Due to the provided retrospective analysis of clinical and experimental studies use of xenogeneic bone substitutes with particles size of 1–2 mm and 0,25–1 mm during the subantral augmentation characterized by the similar results regarding the formation of new bone volume and reduction of graft residue during several months of monitoring. Higher osteoconductive and osteopromotional characteristics of small xenogeneic material particles, which have been verified in experimental and laboratory studies, were not associated with better results of subantral augmentation while comparing with the outcomes of using large sized particles according to the clinical studies data and based on the results of histological and microCT analysis.
References
Bone augmentation followed by implant surgery in the edentulous mandible: a systematic review / R. J. De Groot, M. A. Oomens, T. Forouzanfar, E. A. Schulten. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation. 2018. Vol. 45 (4). P. 334–343.
Rusyn V. V., Keniuk A. T., Goncharuk- Khomyn M. Y. Analysis of dynamic changes of the bone substitutes size parameters during the reconstruction of alveolar ridge under exposure to different influencing factors. Morphologia. 2018. Vol. 12 (1). P. 42–50.
Bone augmentation using autogenous bone versus biomaterial in the posterior region of atrophic mandibles: A systematic review and meta-analysis / C. A. de Sousa, C. A. Lemos, J. F. Santiago-Júnior [et al.]. Journal of Dentistry. 2018. Vol. 76. P. 1–8.
Shamsoddin E., Houshmand B., Golabgiran M. Biomaterial selection for bone augmentation in implant dentistry: A systematic review. Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research. 2019. Vol. 10 (2). P. 46–50.
Effect of xenograft (ABBM) particle size on vital bone formation following maxillary sinus augmentation: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical histomorphometric trial / Testori T., S. S. Wallace, P. Trisi. [et al.]. International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry. 2013. Vol. 33 (4). P. 467–475.
Kamolratanakul P., Jansisyanont P. A study of two xenograft particle sizes in bone healing and angiogenesis in sinus lift procedure. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2019. Vol. 30. P. 549–549.
The impact of deproteinized bovine bone particle size on histological and clinical bone healing outcomes in the augmented sinus: A randomized controlled clinical trial / P. Kamolratanakul, N. Mattheos, S. Yodsanga, P. Jansisyanont. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2022. Vol. 2022. P. 1–11.
Histologic and Micro-CT Analyses at Implants Placed Immediately After Maxillary Sinus Elevation Using Large or Small Xenograft Granules: An Experimental Study in Rabbits / K. Masuda, E. Ricardo Silva, K. A. Alccayhuaman [et al.]. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 2020. Vol. 35 (4). P. 739–748.
Comparison of histomorphometry and microCT after sinus augmentation using xenografts of different particle sizes in rabbits / T. Iida, S. Baba, D. Botticelli [et al.]. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2020. Vol. 24 (1). P. 57–64.
Structural and chemical features of xenograft bone substitutes: A systematic review of in vitro studies / R. Amid, A. Kheiri, L. Kheiri [et al.]. Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry. 2021. Vol. 68 (6). P. 1432–1452.
Block M. S. The processing of xenografts will result in different clinical responses. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019. Vol. 77 (4). P. 690–697.
Kim S., Yeganova L., Wilbur W. J. Meshable: searching PubMed abstracts by utilizing MeSH and MeSHderived topical terms. Bioinformatics. 2016. Vol. 32 (19). P. 3044–3046.
Younger P. Using google scholar to conduct a literature search. Nursing Standard. 2010. Vol. 24 (45). P. 40–46.
Lindgren B. M., Lundman B., Graneheim U. H. Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. International journal of nursing studies. 2020. Vol. 108. P. 103632.
Influence of particle size of deproteinized bovine bone mineral on new bone formation and implant stability after simultaneous sinus floor elevation: A histomorphometric study in minipigs / S. S. Jensen, M. Aaboe, S. F. Janner [et al.]. Clinical implant dentistry and related research. 2015. Vol. 17 (2). P. 274–285.
Implant stability after sinus floor augmentation with deproteinized bovine bone mineral particles of different sizes: a prospective, randomized and controlled split-mouth clinical trial / T. L. M. R. Dos Anjos, R. S. de Molon, P. R. F. Paim [et al.]. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2016. Vol. 45 (12). P. 1556–1563.
A randomized clinical trial comparing two particle sizes in lateral window sinus lift with deproteinized bovine bone mineral: clinical and histological results / P. J. Pebe, A. Ramos, V. Beovide [et al.]. Odontoestomatologia. 2017. Vol. 19. P. 1–13.
A randomized clinical trial evaluating maxillary sinus augmentation with different particle sizes of demineralized bovine bone mineral: histological and immunohistochemical analysis / R. S. De Molon, F. S. Magalhaes-Tunes, C. V. Semedo [et al.]. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2019. Vol. 48 (6). P. 810–823.
Osteoconductivity of Bovine Xenograft Granules of Different Sizes in Sinus Lift: A Histomorphometric Study in Rabbits / E. P. Godoy, K. A. Apaza Alccayhuaman, D. Botticelli [et al.]. Dentistry Journal. 2021. Vol. 9 (6). P. 61.
The impact of the size of bone substitute granules on macrophage and osteoblast behaviors in vitro / M. Fujioka- Kobayashi, H. Katagiri, M. Kono [et al.]. Clinical oral investigations. 2021. Vol. 25 (8). P. 4949–4958.
Küçükkurt S., Moharamnejad N. Comparison of the effects of three different xenogeneic bone grafts used in sinus augmentation simultaneous with dental implant placement on the survival of the implants and the dimensional changes of the region. Minerva dental and oral science. 2021. Vol. 70 (6). P. 248–256.
